Status cards
One graphic, one post, and a clear answer to “what is actually done?” Keep estimates, evidence, and blockers in the same frame.
Progress trackers, incident updates, and a few hard-earned ways to get your dot to do the job you actually asked for.
A dot is ChatGPT’s ongoing assistant. This is my collection of reusable workflows for mine. It is not an official store, and it does not mean the rough bits are fixed.
Each guide explains when to use it, what to give your dot, and what a useful result looks like. The full instructions are plain Markdown you can read before trying anything.
One graphic, one post, and a clear answer to “what is actually done?” Keep estimates, evidence, and blockers in the same frame.
Tell people what is broken, what still works, and what to do next. A green light should mean something.
Check the thing people will see. Catch cramped labels, clipped graphics, broken controls, and motion that gets in the way.
Follow a claim back to its source. Separate what happened, what you inferred, and what you still cannot verify.
Pretty progress is easy. Honest progress needs a scope, evidence, and a way to say “not checked.” Try the states below. The celebration waits for verification.
Six equally weighted milestones. Partial work is an estimate, not time remaining.
The scope is agreed and the build is partly complete. No release or live check yet.
Choose a state, then see what an unchanged or failed check does to the two clocks.
All numbers, events, and times here are examples. This page does not connect to Slack, check a real project, or schedule work.
Choose the deliverables and the proof you need before calculating a percentage. “Code written” and “working for staff” are different milestones.
A fresh check does not mean fresh progress. A failed check should not make old evidence look current.
Prepare the full card, replace the approved original when the tools support it, then read it back. No placeholder post and no surprise extra ping.
A broken test browser does not undo completed code. It also does not prove the release works. Keep the progress; name the missing check.
These are instructions to adapt, not buttons that install access to your accounts. Start small enough that you can check the result.
Choose one job. Review the inputs, examples, and limits before giving the instructions to your dot.
Name the destination, posting identity, permitted actions, and what must stay private. Have the dot read back what it saved.
Inspect the delivered result. A recurring schedule should come after that check, not stand in for it.
Share a redacted example, the failure, or an improvement. State what you tested and what you could not test.
I want this to become a place to share useful dot workflows, not just screenshots of things that worked once. For now, it is a small, public collection with readable instructions and visible limits.
A good submission includes a real task, a reusable method, an example, and a frank account of what failed. No one-click installation or blanket compatibility claim is implied.